Beverly Diamonds Reviews – Who Wins?

Let’s say that after a less-than amicable breakup, a couple fights over the engagement ring, and the dispute rises to the level of a lawsuit. What do you do? Write a beverly diamonds complaint? No, you go to court.


Who wins?

Surprisingly, there is no uniform law in the United States. The answer depends on how the court conceptualizes the engagement ring. Some describe the ring as an absolute gift; once it is given, the giver has no claim over it. Others think of the ring as a token of love, like all the folks writing beverly diamonds reviews, and once that love is broken, the token should be returned. Both beliefs make sense psychologically. The latter belief puts more emphasis on the emotion and the sentimental psyche behind the ring, whereas the first belief treats engagement rings as other gifts are treated.

In sum, whether you can keep the ring depends on which state you live in. Courts have treated engagement rings in a spectrum of ways: If you read beverly diamonds reviews, you’ll understand what people go through.

Concept: Conditional Gift

Result: She Must Return the Ring

Some states treat the engagement ring as a conditional gift—specifically, a gift conditioned upon marriage. If the marriage does not eventuate, then the gift has to be returned because the condition was not met. Pennsylvania is an example of such a state.

Concept: Pledge

Result: She Must Return the Ring

Some states treat the engagement ring as a pledge. In this concept, the ring represents the pledge, or promise, to get married. Intellectually, there is a difference between a pledge and a conditional gift because the pledge means the ring is symbolic rather than material, whereas the conditional gift means that the ring operates as a material gift except with strings attached. However, the practical effect is the same. Ohio is one state that treats engagement rings as pledges.

Concept: Considerationbeverly diamonds reviews

Result: She Must Return the Ring

Some states treat engagement rings as consideration for a contract. “Consideration” is a legal term of art in contract law. In order for a contract between two parties to be binding, there must be “consideration,”—a fancy word for “exchanged value.” For example, if I promise to sell you a puppy for $100, the puppy is consideration for the $100, and the $100 is consideration for the puppy. Where there is no consideration exchanged—if I promise to give you the puppy for free—the contract is not enforceable in court.

Contracts do not have to be in writing, nor must they be explicit. Courts have found enforceable contracts in situations where the agreement was oral, and have also imposed contracts where the actions of the parties seem to indicate that a contract existed. Here, the theory is that the engagement ring was “consideration” exchanged for the promise of marriage. If the marriage does not happen, then the contract was broken (in legal terms, “breached”), and the ring would have to be returned. Virginia is an example of such a state.